Response to the Empty Force Test and Rebuttal John David Morenski, M.D.

A previous issue of Swft published an article I co-authored concerning the test of an individual who claimed on a popular martial arts web-page, www.uechi-ryu.com, that he could perform extraordinary feats through his mastery of chi 1. These included healing people of illnesses that evidence-based medicine “had failed,” halting physical attacks without touching the aggressor, and even moving individuals without touching them. Also spelled “Qi” or “Ki,” chi represents a rather broad paradigm intended to explain many different and often conflicting events. 

According to proponents, chi is an energy that flows through the body through pathways designated “meridians,” which explains many complex physiologic events such as disease, balance, and strength. This broad definition renders the concept resistant to investigation. It is the fault of science, which can measure the attractive and repulsive forces of atoms, that it cannot measure this energy. 

One cannot examine an “eastern” paradigm through “western” means, unless, of course, misuse of the “western” and “scientific” terminology lends respectability. Reality becomes a subject of interpretation; it becomes relative. Einstein wrote a few things concerning relativity. Quantum mechanics discusses complicated issues in the terms of “probabilities,” and there exists this principle of uncertainty. Thus, personal conceptions of reality must be scientific since they are relative and seem to have a lot of uncertainty.

The relativistic approach where opinion and belief can govern interpretation may succeed in art criticism; it fails miserably as a method to describe reality. I am aware of no evidence that the laws of physics prove geographically relative. Sadly perhaps, how an investigator “feels” or “wants” influences his results not a wit. Science attempts to remove opinion and bias from observations. Science makes observations and tries to explain them. Sometimes further observations overturn previous explanations. 

Proponents of paradigms such as chi tend to work in the opposite direction. They form an explanation and then attempt to find evidence for it. This is not necessarily a faulty method; researchers can think up an explanation and search for evidence to support it. The difference is that proponents of chi accept only evidence that supports their conclusions and ignore anything else. Scientists have to explain unexpected and unwanted results. 

Researchers may “believe” and “want” cold fusion to happen. Fusion of deuterium should produce neutrons. The scientists have to explain why the experiment produced no neutrons.2,3 Protesting that “western science” cannot “understand” or “apply” does not excuse the lack of results. When proponents specify an aspect of their paradigm, they provide something a researcher may test. The individual offered such a specification. He stated he had the ability to move another person without touching them. Indeed, he claimed he could move another even when separated from him physically and visually by a barrier such as a wall. 

Whether or not the resources of science can detect the apparent force exerted by the individual no longer mattered; we could test the effect. As the study explained, many explanations for why a person may move exist without resorting to mechanisms that overturn the laws of physics. To remove such influences, the authors created a double-blind study. The individual agreed to the conditions and timing of the test and what would constitute a success prior to the test. That fact requires emphasis given his subsequent explanations for his failure to produce an effect.

The publishers of Swift granted permission to reprint the article on the web-site that hosted the individual and discussions concerning his claims. Publication generated a rebuttal of sorts from the individual (Mattson). By way of fairness, I feel his opinion deserves responsible consideration.

He opens: 

In the past twelve years of cultivating Qi, I have been able to realize a certain amount of success and have made public my results. I have been greeted with skepticism by a great many people, and have since shown that my abilities are valid in the realms of Healing (sic) and Martial (sic) use of Qi derived from the practice of Qigong. 4

Certainly, a demonstration of the “abilities” would end the matter. Yet, he offers no demonstration, no data, and nothing beyond a written claim. I can claim that I have convinced “a great many people” of my ability to fly. Unfortunately, I imagine the majority would want me to demonstrate it.

The test offered such a demonstration. It isolated a claimed effect of the existence of chi. The individual could not demonstrate his effect under conditions that he agreed he could. Thus, when he continues, “It is sad that modern technology, while advanced, is not yet up to the task of being able to detect or measure Qi. It is hoped that one day such advanced technical know how (sic) will exist, and verify that which has been known for millennia: Qi exists,” 4 he avoids the issue. He places the blame on science. Science simply is not good enough to detect the existence of his power. He conveniently forgets that he failed to demonstrate his power. I can just as well claim that my power to fly “has been known for millennia.” My audience still wishes me to jump out of the window.

A rebuttal to an argument tends to focus on the elements of the argument. One might expect the individual to attend to the details of the test in order to demonstrate how it failed to reveal an effect which occurred. Of course, he could simply demonstrate the effect under proper conditions. Prior to the test he claimed he could meet the requirements of the JREF for such a demonstration, “any time, any where.” Thus far, he has refused to provide this definitive evidence. Instead, much of his “rebuttal” wanders into claims similar to those forementioned. Despite the “sound and fury,” without any supporting evidence, it “signifies nothing.”

Martial artists did not miss the one very critical problem. Martial arts involve martial matters and despite appearances they proves rather scientific. We are, ultimately, interested in preventing another individual from harming us. In the pursuit of this interest, we often create many wondrous techniques to defeat imagined foes. In the process, we “means test” our precious beliefs. I may believe that no one can avoid or block my kicks. Unfortunately, recent objective tests of this belief in the training halls have failed to demonstrate the invincibility of my techniques. It is hoped that one day such advanced technical know-how will exist and verify my invincibility.

Since the individual could not demonstrate his powers under rather benign conditions that he agreed upon, martial artists did wonder how effective such powers would prove in real self-defense situations. Perhaps opponents will surpass the abilities of modern technology and respond appropriately to the individual’s powers. Nevertheless, some of the marital artists who read the article and rebuttal have preferred to stake their faith in other methods.

The patient reader will eventually stumble upon an address, of sorts, of the results reported in the article. The individual protests:

On any given day a champion weight lifter cannot match his best lift, a World-Class sprinter cannot duplicate their best run, and the best fighter’s punch could fail against any amount of competitors. Does that mean that those people’s accomplishments are invalid or faked? NO. Some will even go to certain lengths to come up with various tests in an effort to validate or invalidate a specific method. Results of such tests, be they favorable or unfavorable, are insignificant when compared the results gained as a whole, and over a broader period of time than one test may allow. 4

Thus, should my preliminary flight-test for the JREF prize result in a completely unexpected personal introduction to the cement below my window, this result and any inconvenient reconstructive surgery and lengthy rehabilitation are insignificant when compared to my results gained as a whole. I suppose readers may wish I provide these results which they should consider “as a whole;” however, they are skeptics and, therefore, obliging them would waste my time.

That remains the issue. The individual offers neither results nor “accomplishments.” Anyone can claim anything. The individual tries to hide behind a truth that does not apply to his failure. The champion weight lifter may not match his best lift; one would expect him to lift two ounces. The sprinter may not break his personal best; he should make it out of the starting block. Not unfamiliar to fallacy, the individual ducks under false analogies. He apparently hopes no one will remember that he agreed to the timing of the test and the test conditions. After the fact, he offers the old excuses familiar to investigators of such matters.

I reiterate that he claimed effects with martial applications. He felt the personal and situational conditions proper to demonstrate his claimed powers. He could not demonstrate an influence, let alone a dramatic effect. If he finds his powers so capricious to a controlled and ideal situation, martial artists may wonder how reliable he will find them in an actual attack. He continues: “One such event happened with me a few summers ago in Massachusetts, at a long weekend camp given by a group of Uechi Rya [the style of karate practiced by most of the participants] people. In the venue that was picked, I did not succeed, and I view that as a “Oh Well!” kind of happening.” 4 “In the venue that was picked,” demonstrates an interesting misuse of the passive voice. He agreed to all aspects of the venue before his demonstration. Self-defense situations generally involve surprise venues, without the opportunity to agree upon the conditions. Generally, “Oh Well!” tends to falter as a response.

Yet, he continues: “Not long there after I went to England and put on a series of very successful seminars, and I was very successful in demonstrating both my Medical (sic) and Martial Qigong abilities to the satisfaction of thousands of people across the United Kingdom. “4 How capricious fortune proves! Had we only followed him across the Atlantic we would have seen all of the results he promised and more. Do not let the damage to the cement underneath my window or my altered visage dissuade you; in another country in the future rest assured I will fly. Regrettably, some will take such statements as “proof.” Properly designed and executed objective tests remove biases. Unless the individual performed under proper conditions, his claims of miracles unseen and undocumented remain as substantive to my claims of flight-just so much air.

References:

3Park, R: Voodoo Science: The Road from Foolishness to Fraud.New York, Oxford University Press, 2000.

Author: The JREF has been assured that Dr. Morenski will succeed in preliminary tests of his ability to fly for the million dollar prize as soon as he is back on solid food.

An Empty Force

John David Morenski, M.D. and William P. Glasheen, Ph.D.

The Claim: On one of the forums of a very popular marital arts web page, www.uechi-ryu.com, an individual claimed he could perform rather extraordinary feats which include the ability to move others without touching them. Chi, also spelled “Qi” or “Ki,” has become a popular concept in martial arts circles in recent years. 

Stated simply, proponents believe an energy, designated “chi,” flows through the body along non-anatomical pathways call “meridians.” Proponents employ this basic paradigm to explain very complicated physiologic events, such as the mechanics of movement and balance and even diseases. Despite this simple model’s utility, this energy eludes scientific detection. One supreme difficulty investigators encounter when they attempt to examine chi is its lack of a clear definition. 

For proponents, chi can become anything they wish, and they build into the concept considerable room to maneuver. Thus, if one wishes to attribute health to chi, one may explain an illness as a relative decrease in the person’s chi. Should the person improve, his improvement results from increased levels of chi. Chi can then explain placebo effects, the variations in the course of an illness, the body’s ability to recover, and even the results of medical therapy. Proponents may justify their faith in the reality of chi by citing copious anecdotal reports. Chi proves a self-justifying paradigm. Investigators often find themselves trapped with the task of disproving the existence of chi, rather than discovering objective evidence for its existence.

The Test: The individual, however, presented a testable phenomenon. He claimed he could move others without touching them through an “empty force.” His results in demonstrations appeared impressive. Some participants dramatically fell backwards. Offered uncontrolled demonstra-tions and unsubstantiated claims, the author and others remained skeptical. 

The administrator of the web page, George E. Mattson, a martial artist with over 40 years experience, persuaded the individual to submit to a controlled test as part of his demonstration during the recent martial arts summer camp. The design of the test developed over a roughly six month period through the combined efforts of Mr. Mattson, Bill Glasheen, a Ph.D. with solid background in biomedical engineering, and the author. James Randi privately provided many suggestions that tightened the controls of the test. Dr. Morenski insisted on a double-blind test of a specific ability. 

The individual claimed he could move others without touching them, even through a barrier that prevented the subjects and the individual from seeing or hearing one another. The investigation employed two rooms separated by a wall. Both the individual and volunteer subjects stood at defined positions on opposite sides of the wall. The individual received for each subject one of three random tasks: “push,” “pull,” or “do nothing.” The individual would then attempt to either pull the subject forward, push him backward, or do nothing. 

For randomization, Dr. Glasheen used a shuffled deck of cards with one suit removed. Each suit represented an action. After drawing a card, Dr. Glasheen informed the individual of the intended action. Prior to the test, he agreed that one minute would be sufficient to move a subject. 

Bill Jackson, who videotaped the subjects, called out the number and the time of start and finish for each volunteer. Blinding the judges proves critical in such investigations. Even sincere and skeptical observers may be influenced if they know what they are suppose to observe. The author cited Mr. Randi’s examination of a Russian psychic in his NOVA special, Secrets of the Psychics, as a demonstration of the need for a double-blind study.1 

The Russian psychic claimed, with the support of Russian scientists, the ability to alter a person’s blood pressure and brain waves. Knowing what the psychic intended, the investigators consistently found evidence for the alterations. When properly blinded to the intent of the psychic, the scientists observed alterations that matched the psychic’s intentions only by random chance. Thus, an observer who knew the individual intended to “push” the subject may very well consider any backward movement in the random swaying of a subject as a “positive” result. 

Dr. Glasheen provided a panel of blind judges. He submitted a videotape of the test to the judges, who were not present at the test Dr. Glasheen instructed the each judge to decide whether a volunteer moved forward, backward, or did not move at all. They were allowed to view a video of a demonstration performed by the individual in which he stops an attacker’s kick and pushes him back without touching him in order to know what to expect. 

For the purposes of testing this individual’s claim, Dr. Morenski further insisted that volunteers not know that the individual intended to move them in some way. If the subject knows the individual intends to move him, he may move and introduce a bias in the data. A very skeptical volunteer may try very hard not to move. 

Mr. Mattson and Dr. Glasheen contended it would prove interesting to know what the volunteers felt happened to them. At the conclusion of the test, but without knowing what the individual attempted to do to him, each subject was allowed to state what he felt. The subjects consisted of twenty summer camp participants. Some had participated in the individual’s previous open demonstrations. Some considered themselves believers in the existence of chi and this “empty force.” Some considered themselves skeptical if not complete unbelievers. None of the principle investigators served as volunteers or judges. 

The results did not require analysis. Only two subjects, one whom the individual personally knew and who assists him during demonstrations, moved to any appreciable degree and another who strongly supports the existence of chi and participated in demonstrations. The first moved in the wrong direction, while the second, first moved in the wrong direction then the correct direction. What the subjects reported they felt had happened to them during the test did not correlate in any manner to what the individual intended. 

After the test, Dr Glasheen asked the first sixteen volunteers what direction they thought they should have moved. Only one out of the total sixteen asked felt he had moved in the direction intended. Under controlled conditions, the individual could not demonstrate the “empty force.”

Discussion: It is not the responsibility of investigators to disprove an extraordinary phenomenon. Proponents must provide evidence. This experiment underscores the need for a scientific process. In removing confounding influences, the double-blind study suggests how these effects occur without proper controls. 

Proponents must define specifically what they wish to test. Believers readily attach attributes to phenomena which can claim any effect as evidence. A proponent may intend to move a specific subject and fail, but then claim that movement of an audience member resulted from his powers. As the wise men become buried under the fool’s questions, investigators feel forced to disprove any aspect thrown at them. 

This experiment isolated one aspect of the individual’s claims, specifically his claimed ability to move another person without touching him. A positive result would occur only if the subject moved in the intended direction determined by chance. A greater number of positive results than expected by chance would indicate that the individual could influence a subject. 

The individual approved of all aspects of the test and what would indicate positive and negative results prior to the test. Since observers of a claim who know what they expect or hope to find may find evidence of it whether or not the evidence truly exists, the judges did not know the intended results for each subject. That none of the volunteers moved in the manner intended simplifies the analysis. 

Witnesses of both the dramatic open demonstrations and the test may wonder what happened. Simply stated, strict controls removed other influences. Analysis of the controls suggests reasons for the results seen in the uncontrolled demonstrations. Participants in these seminars stood straight, often with their arms and hands fully extended. The individual then made motions in the direction he wished the participants to fall. Anyone familiar with the ideomotor effect seen in dosing or Charcot’s pendulum will recognize an analogy. In all cases, an object exists in an unstable position. Dowsers hold rods in such a manner that the slightest movement of the hands or body will result in movement of the rods. 

With Charcot’s pendulum, the subject suspends a watch or pendent on a string or chain held between his index finger and thumb. Very small movements of the hand muscles that the subject and witnesses do not notice will cause the pendulum to move. Individuals can influence these minute muscle movements. A person moving his hand around the pendulum can appear to make the pendulum swing and even rotate in the direction he wishes. The human body is essentially and unstable structure. The axial muscles of the back along with the muscles of the limbs actively maintain a stable position. Vision, vestibular, proprioception, and cerebellar pathways work in conjunction to correct small deviations. Any impairment of these systems or the muscles they influence will affect a person’s ability to maintain a stable posture. 

Just as a person holding a pendulum or a dowsing rod can influence their movements, a person standing can sway in the direction intended. Indeed, it is impossible to maintain station without even the slightest sway. The individual attempting to move the subject and any observers may attribute any sway in the intended direction as evidence of the apparent empty force. However, swaying does not account for subjects falling. The holder of the pendulum received constant reinforcement from the individual trying to move the pendulum. 

The individual moves his hand in the direction he wishes and gives verbal encouragement: “See? It is moving!” Audience members may join in the reinforcement. The empty force demonstrations often involve a number of volunteers, some who have attended if not assisted in previous demonstrations. Their movements serve as a visual reinforcement of what the subjects are expected to do. Part of the purpose of Chariot’s Pendulum is to select subjects who are more suggestible than others. The individual demonstrating the empty force may then select subjects who respond better than others and use them for progressively more involved demonstrations. Each “positive” result reinforces further cooperation in the subject and may strongly influence new subjects. The double-blind study removes all of these confounding influences. Without them, subjects behaved as one would expect if no force exists. 

That the empty force cannot demonstrate specific results without confounding influences may lead on to conclude that these influences in and of themselves explain the dramatic results observed in uncontrolled demonstrations.

References: 1 NOVA: Secrets of the Psychics, copyright: WGBH Educational Television, 1993

Acknowledgments: The author wishes to thank George E. Mattson for proposing and sponsoring this test. It would not have been possible without his constant encouragement and occasional diplomacy. He has practiced and taught martial arts for over forty years, and he runs the annual summer camp in Buzzard’s Bay, Massachusetts. For more information about the marital arts or the annual Martial Arts Camp, visit the Eastern Arts website: www.uechi-ryu.com or call Mr. Mattson at (508) 586-3969 or e-mail at: gmattson@uechi-ryu.com. 

James “the Amazing” Randi  (www.randi.org) patiently answered questions and critiqued the test during throughout its design. His suggestions proved invaluable for designing a proper study. Joe Nickell, CSICOP Senior Investigator, provided suggestions for conducting the test and, especially, for reporting and analyzing the data. Bill Jackson provided volunteered his time and expertise videotaping the test.

Authors: John David Morenski, M.D. has practiced martial arts for twenty years and serves as a Clinical Fellow with the Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington. He often acts as the resident skeptic for the forums on www.uechi-ryu.com.

William P. Glasheen, Ph.D., has practiced martial arts for nearly thirty years. He received his doctorate in Biomedical Engineering and is currently the Director of Health Care Assessment for Trigon Blue Cross Blue Shield in Richmond, Virginia and a Visiting Assistant Professor for the Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Virginia. He administers one of the general forums on www.uechi-ryu.com . 

Copyright 2000 by John David Morenski, M.D. and William P. Glasheen, Ph.D. All Rights Reserved

Looking towards the future!

by George E. Mattson

As 2000 winds down, thoughts turn towards the new year and new hopes and aspirations. Among other things I’ve been accused of by my detractors, is being a dreamer! In the early 60s I saw Uechi-ryu prominently involved with the emerging freefighting era. In the early 70s I envisioned Uechi-ryu remaining a unified and dynamic organization, with successful dojo throughout the world working together. My goal and emphasis was always to work within the Uechi framework of tradition and style. In the early 80s, I introduced the Uechi world to its Southern China ancestors, believing that exploring Uechi-ryu’s past would enhance and vitalize its future. Again, I hoped that Okinawa, China and the rest of the world could work together in some kind of accord that would strengthen Uechi-ryu. Although no accord happened, through the annual Summer Camp, hosting multiple styles of the martial arts, Uechi-ryu has become and remains a state-of-the-art system that has evolved and has been able to survive in an era of intense competition. 

Today, Uechi-ryu (and nearly all traditional systems) has moved away from traditionalism and its Far Eastern heritage. A new emphasis has focused on a more individual dojo approach, based on an eclectic blend of broadly interpreted set of old movements. The unified goal of Kanei Uechi has been shattered by seniors who took the organizational shell too seriously and who focused their attention on the shell and not enough attention to the heart. I was probably one of the last “Traditionalists” to recognize that in order to survive in this new millennium, organizations must rethink their original attitudes regarding the ‘old’ ways and the people we trusted to pass and preserve these methods. 

I had long ago given up on the idea of a one-world martial art’s organization. . . Or even a unified Uechi-ryu world. The concept of a “Ryu” is too firmly imbedded in this generation’s consciousness to accept anything but the old way of running a dojo and by extension, an organization. As an art, we have not accepted the concept of the individual within the art. Too many of us look for the standard by which all should be judged and once discovered, are intolerant of others who see the standard from another perspective. Obviously, the future of the martial arts lie with the new teachers and open minded elders.

Lots of things have happened since I taught my first class at the Boston YMCA in 1958. We tend to look at all the bad things people do and ignore all the wonderful things accomplished. In spite of all the setbacks we have had in Uechi-ryu and the martial arts in general, think of all the advances! Many of you new students are blessed with teachers who are truly talented and gifted. As students, you will make new mistakes I’m sure, but as a group, you are so much better off today than 40, 20 or even 10 years ago. You are spoiled as well, because there are so many fantastic martial arts being taught all around you. In 1958, I was the only game in town! Today, your biggest problem is selecting which dojo to attend.

Teachers today must be the very best in order to survive. Mediocrity may attract a couple of students, but will not sustain a dojo. Old timers continue to reside in their cocoons, live in the past and revel in their past accomplishments while the new teachers search for the best methods and are eager to share their techniques and interpretations with the world. The keepers of the time capsules continue to guard their secrets and segregate their students from the outside world while the new generation downplay styles and focus on individual skills. We no longer debate over which style is better, for most know it is the individual, not the style that makes a difference.

As a dreamer, I continue to push and pull martial artists into looking for areas of similarity instead of differences. I still consider myself to be a traditionalist, but prefer to define this term as it relates to the twenty first century, rather than what it meant to me in 1958. I’m more focused today on working with like minded martial artist than I am on trying to save the Uechi-ryu world. 

Marty Dow once said of me, “I like working with you. You are controversial and make lots of mistakes, but you mean well and you do make things happen!” As we go into 2001, I am looking forward to working with you all, making lots of things happen! Join me in celebrating a new and better relationship with our fellow martial artist. Let’s tear down the barriers, forget the past and let’s concentrate on working out together and building a stronger, better vision of traditional martial arts. 

Copyright 2001 by David Elkins, 1160 Garden Grove, Roseburg, OR 97470
Telephone # 541/672-3565

ELEMENTS OF FAJIN IN UECHI-RYU KARATE

By David Elkins, L.C.S.W

This article will examine two movements from the hojo undo(preparatory exercises) sequence of Uechi-Ryu Karate and explore elements of fajin (expressed energy) contained therein. Each hojo undo sequence will be described, andfajin implications will be presented.
The material of the kata from which hojo undo derives is profound yet its depths are only revealed to those who earnestly seek.Without such research the movements of kata, and hence a designated style, are at best limited in application. The importance of physically using the movements of kata–individually and in combination–to obtain understanding and ownership cannot be overemphasized. The process of ingraining the movements of kata into the neuromuscular memory of the body is something akin to target shooting. Knowledge of ballistics without practice on the firing range produces no success. Therefore, it is the utilization of both mental and physical energies that allows one to master the movements of kata. Only then can the practitioner begin to see kata not as a catalog of so many techniques but rather as an encyclopedia of energy vectors which are governed by concepts of structure and movement, thus having unlimited potential for bunkai.
It is unusual to associate concepts such as fajin with systems of karate. Understanding the history of Uechi-Ryu karate will make meaningful discussion of material usually associated with the study of Chinese gung-fu.

UECHI-RYU KARATE

Uechi-Ryu Karate is a system of civil combative concepts, techniques, and strategies initially taught by Kanbun Uechi Sensei (1877-1948), and later elaborated by his eldest son and successor, Kanei Uechi Sensei (1910-1991.) The nucleus of the Uechi-Ryu system was learned by Kanbun Uechi Sensei during the period of thirteen years that he lived, studied, and taught in China (1897-1910.) Although scholars believe that Master Uechi studied at several kenpo (way of use of the fist) academies during that period, the majority of his instruction was from Nan Chuan (southern fist) Sifu, Chou Tzu-Ho. Chou Sifu was reputed to have expertise in several fighting styles notably, Tiger Boxing. The Uechi style was initially known as Pangainoon Ryu Karate-Jutsu and represented an amalgam of fighting concepts, techniques, and strategies of the Tiger, Dragon, and Crane Boxing systems.
There are various interpretations of the term Pangainoon–literally “half hard soft.” Assigning specific meaning to this term is difficult in the absence of a context. A conceptual link is necessary to determine what is half hard and what is half soft. The interpretation most favored by the author is “soft outside, hard inside.” This interpretation is akin to a popular idea in Chinese martial arts rou zhong han gong (hard within soft) and has robust implications for analysis of movement within the Uechi style. The favored interpretation denotes a holistic synthesis of yin (soft, receiving, or passive) and yang (hard, aggressive, or active) energies much as that advocated by the so-called internal styles taught today. It suggests relaxed elastic movement necessary for the successful delivery of projectile energy. This is the type of movement necessary to powerfully throw a baseball, or to crush the bones of an opponent. This contention is further reinforced by the overwhelming presence of yang (hard/pointed) striking waza in the Uechi curriculum, i.e., shoken (one knuckle), hiraken (flat fist), hiji (elbow), nukite (spear hand), kakushiken (crane beak), and sokosen (big toe.) Even the ubiquitous palm heel strike (yin) is performed in a yang manner in the Uechi style as a bushiken (coiled thumb.) It is generally accepted that yang (hard) forms are used to strike yin (soft) anatomical points of vulnerability. [For an elaboration of types of strikes and hand actions in the internal Chinese arts the reader is referred to Frantzis', The Power of the Internal Martial Arts.]
As the sands of time have all but obliterated objective evidence regarding the origins of the Uechi style, it is difficult to make statements regarding its antecedents with certainty. Much as Master Chojun Miyagi named his inherited style Goju, based upon an extemporaneous interpretation of the Bubishi, the designation Pangainoon may have been as much the product of Master Uechi’s efforts to describe an important concept of the style as the existence of a formal heraldry. We should remember that in the historic period under consideration, style names, and other significatum such as symbols and uniforms, played a decisively less important role in martial arts than is presently the case. What we do know with certainty, however, is that Uechi-Ryu Karate is largely the product of one man’s intense and prolonged study of Southern Chinese gung-fu.
In delineating the four main karate schools in Okinawa, Master Morio Higaonna traces the lineage of Uechi-Ryu not from an indigenous form of Te (Okinawan unarmed fighting tradition) or an admixture of Te and arts of Chinese origin, but directly from Chinese Kempo. We know also that Uechi-Ryu has historically given little concession to change, and is considered by many knowledgeable practitioners and scholars as one of the last “real” karate systems. “Real” in this sense refers to a close quarter combat system that acknowledges the realities of hand to hand fighting by emphasizing body conditioning and use of the makiwara. Moreover, Uechi- Ryu is still largely taught in the old tradition of individual and small group instruction. It is difficult to imagine another effective means of teaching the subtle energy work required in Sanchin, the first and most important kata in the Uechi system. Shotokan Master Roland Habersetzer, in Karate Fur Meister Mit Korper Und Geist, attributes Uechi Ryu as giving “Mehr als nur ein Hauch von Tradition” meaning that Uechi Ryu gives more than a ‘small breath’ or lip service to tradition.
Compared to other Nan Chuan traditions, a relaxed flow of energy has usually not been taught explicitly in the initial and middle aspects of the Uechi-Ryu curriculum. Until recently, a beginner in Uechi-Ryu would neither have been exposed to the concept of economy of motion nor to that of simultaneous attack and defense although the roots of those principles are latent in the kata and as we shall see, in the hojo undo series. The Uechi system, unlike Wing Chun or Southern Mantis, for example, traditionally exposed the beginning student to an exploration of tension via the Sanchin kata so that he/she may later discover relaxation. The end result is the same: acquisition of total control of one’s self. The Bubishi states “Understanding the physical and metaphysical precepts of hard and soft one must learn that it is the even balance between the two that enables one to overcome the greatest adversary of all, oneself.” This teaching reflects the Taoist doctrine of the ultimate convergence of all extremes. The strategy of teaching manipulation of complimentary feelings is used frequently in other venues such as psychotherapy and other western healing arts. In the management of chronic pain for example, a patient might be taught initially to “make it hurt more” so that they may ultimately realize that they have the power to “make it hurt less.”
Having made the above generalizations regarding the teaching of Uechi- Ryu karate, it would be well to note that there are important changes presently occurring in the evolution of the style, particularly in North America. Senior level practitioners such as George Mattson Sensei–frequently referred to as the Father of Uechi-Ryu in the U.S.– have encouraged all Uechi-ka to explore the “softer” aspects of their art. This trend can only be seen as positive if one agrees with noted authors/practitioners such as Stanley Henning and Adam Hsu in their assertion that it is artificial to attempt to describe Chinese boxing styles in terms of being either internal or external. These are qualities that pertain more specifically to the nature and refinement of individual practice rather than terms that can be applied with any validity to entire art forms. To ignore or minimize either yin or yang in an object is to deny the dynamic symmetry of the universe. History tells us that efforts to do so are doomed. A Wing Chun practitioner focused only upon the blade of the bot jom doh (eight slash broadswords) foolishly overlooks the offensive and defensive potential of the hilt and hand guard of the knives. Similarly, a Uechi practitioner who focuses only upon hardness (tension) will soon burn out (yang = heat) or accommodate to his/her resultant limitations with a robotic, ineffectual expression of the art.
Although other southern Chinese boxing styles and Uechi-Ryu may differ with regard to the methods with which power is generated (particularly at the beginning and intermediate levels of expertise) there are many surprising similarities in the ways they express energy in combative application. The sophistication and elegance of the similarities may be “discovered” at dan level or possibly earlier if one is fortunate enough to have an enlightened instructor and be sufficiently mature to receive what is presented. Unfortunately, such teachings may never be comprehended. If grasped, such understanding may be largely on a visceral level that defies or confounds attempts to teach others. Appreciating similarities in methods of generating and expressing power between different martial art styles are subtle and elusive processes that usually take much long and intensive research.
Despite superficial differences, Uechi-Ryu shares many commonalities with other southern Chinese boxing styles. It shares with its sister styles of coastal southern China a concern for protection and attack of the centerline; an immovable elbow line mechanism for generating upper body power; a stable, relatively high fighting stance; the use of narrow stepping and short arm bridges; a predilection for striking with the hands; use of low and middle gate kicks; and perhaps most significantly, a devotion to its first and most important kata, Sanchin. If there is one unifying thread that characterizes Fukien boxing styles it is reliance upon a form of the Sanchin kata to teach the salient precepts of the system. Patrick McCarthy Sensei recognizes Sanchin (alternately Saam Chien) as common to five Fuzhou Crane Boxing styles: Dragon boxing, Tiger Boxing, Dog Boxing, Arhat (Lohan or Monk Fist) Boxing, and Lion Boxing. Additionally, the recently popularized Ngo Gyo Kun style relies on a version called Sam Chien as the backbone of the system. The Hakka style of Southern Praying Mantis (which possesses more than a casual resemblance to Uechi-Ryu) also relies upon an initial form that has been compared to Sanchin, Som Bo Gin (Three Steps Forward.) Having explored something of the dual citizenship status of Uechi-Ryu as both a valid Okinawan karate and southern Chinese gung-fu style, let us examine the series of movements known as hojo undo.

HOJO UNDO

Hojo undo is an encapsulation of the Uechi curriculum offering some of the most effective self-defense movements of the kata in an abbreviated format. The regular practice of hojo undo allows practitioners to warm up as a group at the beginning of each training session while engraining effective self-defense technique. Use of the term hojo undo in the Uechi style should be differentiated from the same term used by proponents of the Goju-Ryu system which denotes supplementary exercises employing primitive equipment such as sashi ichi (lifting stones), ichi sachi (stone padlocks), nagiri game (gripping jars), chishi (stone lever weight), and kongoken (iron oval weight).
Uechi-Ryu hojo undo teaches self defense in the manner which Master Kanbun Uechi initially taught–that of ikyoryu, the practice of performing one crushing explosive movement at a time. Hojo undo provides an opportunity for repetitive practice of technique favored by all great martial artists. Nothing ingrains a movement and the concepts that underpin its use better than repetition. As hojo undo is not usually performed with a partner, the movements are one step removed from bunkai, thus allowing the trainee an opportunity for thorough and dispassionate exploration of the kinesthetic and combative meaning of each sequence. The advanced practitioner, however, can and should elaborate and train a dyadic application of each hojo undo sequence. In the author’s opinion, each and every element of kata should be explored in two person “slammer” drills. This descriptive term coined by noted Uechi-Ryu Sensei, Van Canna, requires no further explanation.
Hojo undo also allows concentrated training of fajin (expressed power) along a continuum of the individual trainees’ experience and degree of insight. As the practitioner gains experience in the performance of the gross physical movements of hojo undo, he or she will ideally begin an ongoing lifelong process of refinement of the energies deployed in each sequence. At the level of mastery, conscious monitoring will no longer be necessary for even the most subtle physical movement. The practitioner may at this level of development devote themselves to cultivating a sense of enemy in the movement. Ultimately, this training also becomes irrelevant, and at this point refinement of the will or spirit becomes the central focus of training. The karate-ka’s will is now manifested in physical movement and the practitioner and the art are one.

FAJIN

The concept of fajin although multidimensional is neither impenetrable nor unrealizable. Fajin refers to the quality of a movement which is elastic, pulsed or wave-like, and performed with explosively. If you think of a snake coiling (energy compression) and striking (energy release) you will be well on your way to understanding fajin. Popular martial arts instructor and author, Erle Montaigue, highlights an distinguishing feature of fajin when he states “fajin is not a fast movement, it is not a very fast movement, it is an explosive movement.” Montaigue likens fajin to the unconscious, explosive, total body “shaking” that occurs during a sneeze. Kumar Frantzis defines fa as “to discharge, release, throw out, or project” and jin as “power.” Liu Xing-Han and John Bracy define fajin as issuing force based upon increasingly refined timing, angulation, and sensing an opponent’s intention. Michael Babin describes fajin as “the energy of a whip which travels in a wave along its length, to be discharged with explosive force at the tip.” Finally, Dr. Yang Jwing-Ming defines fajin as “using the Yi (mind or intent) to transport the Qi (intrinsic bioelectrical energy.) He states “Use the Qi to urge on the Li” (muscular power.)
From these definitions it becomes clear that fajin is not simply a display of brute force. A simple empty hand percussive strike while potentially efficacious does not begin to approach the destructive potential of the fajin strike. One explanation for the difference is that the effects of the percussive strike are limited to superficial disruption of the bodies tissues. This is especially relevant to the striking of body cavities in which the more deeply penetrating fajin strike produces a greater degree of hydrostatic shock and hence greater disruption to the bodies organ systems. An example of the difference would be to imagine being struck by a the thrust of a log which is suspended from a fulcrum and swung by the force of gravity alone (an iron body training practice.) This represents a superficial percussive strike which might be considered the equivalent of an arm punch in boxing. Contrast that example with being struck by the projectile of a Chinese rope dart or the weight of a manrikigusari (weighted chain)– both far lighter than the log but infinitely more potentially destructive as a consequence of the energy generated by the whipping delivery system. Fajin is considered by many to be the most sophisticated physical expression of energy in the martial arts and Uechi kata are replete with movements ideally performed with fajin.
To fully understand the concept of fajin, it is necessary to examine the theory of jin, that which is projected in the process of issuing fajin. Although there are several definitions of the word jin (alternatively spelled jing, ging, or gin,) the one with which we will be concerned is that of a neuromuscular process involving a unity of body and mind. There are three inseparable elements involved in jin: yi – the mind, li – muscular energy, and qi – bioenergitic life force.
An understanding of these elements can best be understood via a simple analogy. Imagine that you awoke one morning miraculously possessing the muscular strength (li) of a champion Olympic weightlifter. Let’s carry the fantasy a step further and also imagine that you were given the lifter’s indomitable will, powers of concentration, and intellectual understanding of the biomechanics of the competitive lifts (yi). Surprise! Your best efforts on the lifting platform would fall far short of our imaginary superman. The explanation for this irony is that you simply had not paid your dues in hard training to repetitively command (yi) the flow of bioelectrical energy (qi) to activate musculoskeletal patterns (li) necessary for the superior performance of the lifts. Each component is necessary for the process to occur and as martial artists we constantly strive to perfect the three elements singularly and in concert.
As mentioned previously, there are many kinds of jin. The fascinating study of jin exists along a continuum. At one end of the spectrum lie the soft/internal qi practices known as qigong. At the other end is found the hard/external discipline of dynamic tension–classical Uechi-Ryu Sanchin training. The type of jin used primarily in Uechi-Ryu combative application may best be thought of as soft/hard. [To further their research in this area the reader is referred to the excellent typology of jin provided by Dr. Yang Jwing Ming in The Essense of Shaolin White Crane.]
The hallmark of soft/hard jin is the bodies transformation from initially soft (sung or relaxed) to hard at the moment of impact. This type of movement is characterized by an initial and middle phase in which tension is conspicuously absent. At the terminal phase of movement, the muscles are briefly tensed to prevent exceeding the capacity of the tendons and ligaments. The degree of tension employed in this type of movement is neither of the magnitude nor the duration of that involved in kime (focus) – at least not kime expressed at a beginning or intermediate level. This difference reflects the dictum of form following function. Uechi-Ryu is a close combat system that while Okinawan is also Chinese in origin. Thus, the degree of tension employed in the terminal aspect of movement in Uechi-Ryu lies somewhere between that found in typical southern Chinese and Okinawan styles, e.g., Southern Mantis and Shorin-Ryu. Understanding the system’s historical antecedents allows one to reconcile the apparent incongruity of its very appropriate affiliation with both the Okinawan concept of ikken hisatsu (one punch, one kill) and a Chinese model of a relaxed continuous flow of energy–unrelenting until the enemy is red (threat is no more).
Uechi fajin movements are coordinated with the cycle of breathing to maximize power. Interestingly, in discussing breath and power, Dr. Yang Jwing Ming reports that the breath is frequently held at the ultimate moment of striking to maximize muscular focus. This observation is perfectly correlated with the classical Uechi-Ryu Sanchin breathing pattern in which breathing is circular and expelled on exhalation only after the Sanchin strikes and mawashi uke (circle block) movements occur. Dr. Yang quotes a source in Chinese which states “When it is necessary to be hard, it can be hard. When it is required to be soft, it can be soft. Soft and hard can support each other skillfully. Then it is called understanding the jin.” This is the spirit of Pangainoon/Uechi-Ryu Karate, soft outside and hard inside.

Shomen Geri

Having established that it is an historically reasonable and valid inquiry to explore elements of fajin in Uechi-Ryu karate, and having briefly reviewed salient characteristics of this concepts, we will now turn our attention to an in-depth analysis of two specific movements from the hojo undo series. The two movements chosen; sokuto geri (front snap kick) and uke, shuto, ura, chudan tsuki (circle block, knife hand strike, backfist, and one knuckle strike) were chosen as representative of geri (kicking) waza and tsuki (striking) waza respectively in the Uechi style. Each contain movements that are taken directly from Uechi kata, conform to Uechi theory regarding structure and function, and possess the unique flavor of Uechi-Ryu Karate, e.g., a sophisticated observer viewing these movements would have no question that they were seeing a performance of Uechi style karate.
The snap front kick utilizes the sokusen (toe kick or tiger’s tooth). This is the only kicking structure from the original Chinese art taught by Uechi Kanbun Sensei. As such, it reveals much about Uechi-Ryu combat theory: Uechi-Ryu is a system that stresses fast movements (the front snap kick is comparable to the boxing jab); it is a system that is concerned with striking points of anatomical vulnerability (the tiger’s tooth penetrates cavities); it is a system that demands body conditioning of it’s practitioners (the toe is ineffective if not conditioned); the system utilizes borrowing the energy of the opponent to grab and pull him into strikes (the kick is preceded by deflection and grabbing motions); and the system is primarily a hand fighting system with low to midrange kicks used to support the hands (Uechi-Ryu much as other Nan Chuan styles seldom kicks above the waist in non-sporting application.)
The snap front kick permits (and encourages) the development of dragon (coiling) energy. Dragon influence in Uechi-Ryu is variously conceived as:

discrete movement such as descending to the low Sanchin

position immediately prior to the jump in kata Seisan

employment of the dragon spirit of elusive, flexible, and relentless power

or a fluidity that allows the Uechi practitioner to change from tiger (yang) to crane (yin) energy.

Alan Dollar Sensei refers to this quality of elasticity as muchi tengwa, a sticky Okinawan taffy-like confection which may be pulled out of shape only to snap back to its original form. The movements of the dragon are exemplified in shomen geri and are found in all eight Uechi-ryu kata
The shomen geri sequence is the prototype of all front reference block/deflect and strike movements. Front reference refers to the practitioner not the opponent, that is, you are directly facing him, but he does not necessarily directly face you, in fact, ideally, he would not be directly facing you thus negating many of his weapons. Shomen geri reinforces the idea that it is acceptable to pull an opponent into a strike on the same side.

PERFORMANCE OF SHOMEN GERI

A. post – left Sanchin dachi kamae (left foot forward Sanchin position)

The tiger kamae can and should be explored as a stationary qiqong posture. It is used similarly to San Ti (stationary nei gong postures) of Xing Yi Quan and seems to be particularly effective in mobilizing yang energy. In this posture movement is internal as a consequence of reverse or Taoist breathing in which the dan tien (including the circumference of the entire lower abdominal girdle) is withdrawn upon inhalation and pushed out upon exhalation. The tongue touches the roof of the mouth as one inhales/exhales through the nose. The pubococcogeal muscle (located in the perineal area between the genitals and the anus) is gently contracted upon inhalation and relaxed upon exhalation. At the beginning stages of practice one may simply stand for increasing periods of time and become aware of ones root, center, and unity with all other things. At any level of practice the internal organs are massaged by the rhythmic breathing pattern. [Sifu Tim Cartmell and Dan Miller's Xing Yi Nei Gong will provide the reader with ample material to further their research in this very important practice.]

B. ichi – block, right shotei nagashi uke and left hirate mawashi uke (palm heel inside block and open hand circular block.)

Remember that all movement in gung-fu/karate can represent blocks, strikes, Chin Na (seizing) , or Shuai Jiao (wrestling.) In keeping with other Nan Chuan traditions, higher level Uechi Ryu does not distinguish movement into discrete categories of offensive and defensive application. Movements of the kata simply represent paradigms of energy vectors that can be meaningfully applied in unlimited ways.
The right hand performs an inside palm heel block to initiate deflection and trapping. The left hand performs a circle block repelling and grabbing. These hand movements (common to most deflections in Feeding Crane gung-fu style) are simplified as a model for ideal combat circumstances that assume your opponent is unaware of your intent or is not able to respond in an appropriate and timely manner. Ashi sabaki (foot movement) would support the hands should tai sabaki (body movement – redirection) be necessary to change the centerline relationship between you and your opponent. Shomen geri is a linear technique and therefore does not require gross rotary movement of the waist to turn the body or to generate power. However, rarely will combat circumstances be laboratory perfect. In the real world one will seldom be in a direct frontal reference to the opponent and some degree of rotation of the waist will be appropriate and acceptable.
It is important to reiterate that the techniques performed in hojo undo are provided as a simplified template of combat activity that encourage the practitioner to learn the basics of the system while engraining effective self defense technique and developing combative spirit and fajin in each of the movements. The movements themselves are a snapshot in time of combat, and therefore do not address how the practitioner came to be in any given physical relationship to his opponent. Nor do they directly address what happens after the given sequence. Thus, what may seem to the beginner to be a dramatic shortcoming in the curriculum (it’s absence of entry and follow thorough components) is viewed by the seasoned practitioner as an advantage–the amplified power of each of the movements to be applied to an infinite number of combat scenarios.

C. Ni: front snap kick.

The front kick motion originates in the earth, is carried up through the non-kicking lower extremity, is transmitted to the pelvis and the spine. Much as is taught in Sanchin kata, power is brought down from heaven, up from the earth, and out to the opponent. Power is also borrowed from the opponent via pulling in the trapped extremity that has been grabbed with the left hand.
Focus on the muscles involved in this kick should not be the musculature of the thigh, but rather according to noted Uechi-Ryu practitioner/teacher, James Thompson Sensei, the psoas muscles; the greater of which (psoas major) attaches to the lumbar vertebra and inserts on the femur, and the lesser of which (psoas minor) attaches to the lumbar vertebra and inserts into the brim of the pelvis.
The objective in performing shomen geri, as with any strike is to deliver the projectile (in this case the sokusen) with appropriate timing and as much focused speed as possible to a given target. The force involved is a delicate balance of tension and relaxation in the appropriate musculature. Ideally, one would want to have perfect timing of total muscle recruitment in the agonist muscles performing the technique and minimal recruitment (tension) in the antagonistic muscles. A simplified example would be the upper body mechanics involved in the delivery of a punch where the pushing muscles of the shoulder, chest, and arm would be maximally engaged when appropriate, while the pulling muscles of the arm and back would be relaxed until such time that they were needed to provide stability on impact.
An image that can be useful in training powerful kicks and punches is to see the hand or foot as the projectile on a Chinese rope dart. A similar analogy was used by Mr. Miyagi in Karate Kid II, when he cryptically demonstrated the secret of Miyagi style karate to Daniel-san by twirling the clappers on a toy drum. In this fashion, the arm and leg are simply flexible ropes moving much like a whip to deliver maximum velocity to the dart. The Bubishi states “Hand techniques require the use of the body. The body generates the power and the hands serve as the instruments of contact. Like a cat catching a rat, a tiger pulls down a wild boar with its body; the claws serve as the means of contact.” The best training for the development of this type of jin is putting out candles with kicks or strikes. If intent is not combined with fast and correctly structured movement, the candle will not extinguish.
Some Uechi Sensei teach the coordination of deflect/grab/and kick by emphasizing the pulling in and immediate snapping out of the grabbing hand. This application can be seen in vintage films of Uechi Kanei Sensei performing the basic exercises and kata of the style. Performing the sequence in this manner puts shock power into the grab and pull, power which can potentially produce a whiplash type of effect and knockout an opponent. This expression of grabbing hand additionally has the advantage of conditioning the practitioner to strike from a grab. Even if the grab is only partially successful, the opponent still gets hit.
We learn from shomen geri that pulling an opponent in to a strike from the same side as a grab is acceptable. You can grab/pull in and kick, knee, or sweep; grab/pull in and hit (as described above); or hook with a leg/pull in and hit, elbow, or head butt.
The front snap kick is employed similarly to a boxing jab, it creates distance when needed, earns the respect of the adversary, and when properly employed can create a knockout situation. Master Ryuko Tomoyose has described the Uechi kick as one that drops the opponent where he stands. There is no thrust involved in this kick and as a product of it’s weapon of choice (the sokusen) is designed to be used against vulnerable anatomical sites. The toe kick has awesome penetration as evidenced by Uechi Sensei Robert Campbell’s tameshiwara of six, one inch pine boards. When asked where he targeted sokosen, a senior Okinawan practitioner responded “Where ever I kick – it breaks.”

D. San: Repeat of the ichi movement on the other side.

As Sanchin stepping (C or semicircular movement) is performed to advance to the next hojo undo movement, the practitioner is effectively performing another kick, a leg sweep, clearing an obstruction (such as the opponent’s foot), or otherwise favorably changing the facing relationship with the opponent. This allows the practitioner to bring a formidable array of weapons to bear upon the opponent while he ideally has restricted options from which to choose.

E. Chi: Repeat of the Ni movement on other side.

Uke, Shuto, Ura, Chudan Tsuki – The Tiger, Dragon, and Crane

This complex block/attack movement is uniquely Uechi-Ryu in appearance from the initiation of the circle block to the completion of the sequence when the final strike (shoken tsuki) is retracted back into a Sanchin posted position. As is the case with other hojo undo sequences, uke/shuto is taken from kata and reveals much to the critical eye.
This sequence as much as any to be found within the curriculum typifies the three animal inspirations of the style: tiger, dragon, and crane. The palm heel deflection and circular block characteristic of Uechi-ryu connotes the crane, a relatively fragile animal who possesses survival characteristics of agility, skillful timing, angulation, and the ability to strike with laser point accuracy.
The subsequent three strikes using the edge of the hand, backfist, and one-knuckle punch are delivered with tiger like ferocity, their sole impetus being the utter crushing destruction of the enemy.
The dragon spirit is found in both the relentlessness with which the strikes follow one another, and the subtle primarily upper body energy transformations used to power the strikes. The dragon is known as epitomizing the ancient gung-fu adage “float and sink, swallow and spit.” It is necessary to sink the body and use the coiling power of “swallow-spit” when delivering elbow line powered techniques such as backfist and straight punch in rapid succession on the heels of a rotary powered technique such as shuto. If the dragon inspired mechanisms described were not employed, the entire sequence would lack vitality and have the quality of what boxing refers to as arm punching. Without these energy transformations each successive technique would diminish in intensity, the final shoken representing a whimper not a bang!
The strikes in this sequence are unique in that they are three in number. The number three in Chinese cosmology is replete with significance, especially as it applies to the martial arts. Taoist internal alchemy is predicated upon reunion and refinement of the three treasures, jing - generative energy; qi - vital energy; and shen – spiritual energy.) These energies are stored in the three dan tiens (elixir fields), which are controlled by three gates (Wei Lu; Mingmen; and Yu Gen.)
Sanchin (three conflicts or battles), upon which Uechi-Ryu and most Fukien civil fighting arts are based, is taught to represent three levels of meaning usually interpreted as body, mind, and spirit.
Functionally, the three strikes (shuto, uraken, shoken) may guide the trainee to striking the same point on the opponent’s body three times or it may represent a series of strikes to various anatomical points. Nothing in the curriculum of traditional karate is presumed to be of random occurrence. It is therefore significant that the three strikes are in an ascending order of focus of energy, e.g., from the edge of the hand chop to the one-knuckle punch the striking surface area becomes progressively smaller. At the very least, the three strikes can be thought of as comprising what Southern Mantis practitioners refer to as “live power,” the quality of a hand to be continuous and flowing without breaking contact. In Wing Chun gung-fu the attack and defense pyramids used in combat are said to possess the quality of multidirectionality, that is, motion that travels in at least two but usually three directions at once. This quality when combined with juen ging (whirlpool energy) – the application of circular energy to linear motions) results in movement of technique that resembles a drill bit, e.g., encountering an obstacle results in penetration or deflection but not cessation of movement. This is the awesome power of the spiral. So too, the shuto, uraken, and shoken can be thought of as successive machine gun-like attacks which neither withdraw to chamber nor cease their relentless penetration when confronted with obstacles.
A. Post: Left Sanchin dachi
B. Ichi: block right shotei nagashi uke and left hirate mawashi uke
(palm heel inside block and open hand circular block.) Text describing ichi in shomen geri section is applicable here.
C. Ni: After performing the right palm heel slapping block, the right hand returns to the guard position in the center of the chest at elbow level. Sensei vary in their interpretation of the next move–initiation of the shuto uchi. Some teachers stress chambering the right hand prior to raising it to eye level to initiate the edge of the palm strike while others advocate an immediate placement of the right hand from the guard position to eye level and readiness to strike. The latter interpretation is preferred by the author for two reasons: it eliminates an unnecessary syllable of movement/time necessary to chamber and then raise the hand (which also may encourage bypassing the all important retraction to guard position – a hand that is not occupied with blocking, grabbing, or striking duties should always be retracted to guard position), and whereas the former interpretation is performed using primarily shoulder power, the latter utilizes a subtle rotary motion of the waist in addition to the spinal wave generated to power the shuto strike thus resulting in greater power.
The flow of energy in the ni phase of the movement is similar to that described in shomen geri. This force is augmented by coiling and uncoiling the waist. Further power is borrowed from the opponent via pulling in the trapped extremity which has been grabbed by your left hand after the circle block. Energy from the earth traveling up the skeleton is amplified by successive snapping of joints and transferred to the left and right arms as they engage in yin (centripetal – left) and yang (centrifugal – right) motion. The right hand which was cocked at eye level is hurled toward the opponent and around to the right.
D. San: The right hand shuto, having scored on the count of ni, now retracts slightly along the elbow line to immediately strike again using the uraken (backfist.) The retraction at this point may be thought of as primarily serving the purposes of the drill. The presence or absence of a retraction in a real fight would be dictated by the exigencies of combat. Should the shuto have been partially blocked, or should the opponent have thrown a punch that obstructed the shuto, the second wave of energy used in its deployment could continue with the only real change being that of converting the shuto’s forward/outward trajectory into the forward trajectory of the uraken.
Similarly, the energy used to power the backfist could be simple elbow line power utilizing the pushing muscles (triceps, anterior deltoids, and pectorals) stabilized by the back muscles or; time, opportunity, and circumstances permitting, a more sophisticated expression of fajin could be employed using a third wave of energy of the hips, spine and chest to retract and strike. The lower extremities would support this second strike if possible by shifting body weight into the opponent in the form of a shuffle or drop-step.
E. Chi: The right hand uraken, having scored on the count of san, now retracts fully to the chambered position prior to striking straight shoken (one-knuckle punch.) Again, the retraction is necessary for the integrity of the drill, but would not necessarily be done in actual combat. This retraction could easily represent an opportunity to catch up with an incoming strike, deflecting and controlling it while the left hand freed from trapping could return fire in any number of possible strikes. The left hand would then resume trapping duties while the right hand drove in with the prescribed shoken. Reflecting back to the live power or continuous flow of energy argument posited for this hojoundo sequence, one may ask the question “what justification other than training fajin would there be for three strikes with the same hand?” Strikes necessitating retractions occupy valuable syllables of time in which the opponent could be struck with another technique or conversely, could be striking you!
Following the straight shoken punch, the count would begin again at ichi. After a series of repetitions on the right side, the practitioner would advanced to right Sanchin dachi and an equal number of repetitions would be performed on that side.
There is, however, a transitional movement at this point in time that is frequently omitted. That movement is the twisting retraction of the shoken. Ideally, the fist is retracted along the elbow line into a Sanchin post position (palm up.) From that point, the hand is opened into Sanchin (nukite) position, the elbow is driven forward, the hand is coiled (supinated) to tiger kamae, and finally, the elbow is retracted into Sanchin position. In the author’s opinion, the omission of this transitional movement is inadvisable. The movement in question teaches several important lessons to the trainee
· One – it encourages proper performance of the initial palm heel block. The palm heel block should be delivered on an angle of 45 degrees to the imaginary plane connecting the core of your body to that of your opponent. From that initial thrust, the movement may then be altered via wrist/finger snap to strike vulnerable points along the inside of the opponent’s arm. Omission of the posted shoken often results in sloppy execution of the palm heel movement that is forced to travel backward from its extended shoken position in a catch-up movement that may or may not successfully deflect an incoming strike
· Two – the posted shoken simulates grabbing/tearing and pulling back whatever the practitioner encounters. The movement of retraction also represents an opportunity to borrow power for the opposite hand/foot in delivering another strike
· Three – the retraction of the shoken strike into Sanchin post position encourages the trainee to develop an instinctual reaction to bring the elbows in to guard the flanks after striking/ grabbing/ or blocking. All of the benefits enumerated are lost when the trainee is encouraged to whip the arms around in the air in the service of speed rather than precision.
A most interesting set of speculations may be applied to this complete hojo undo sequence based upon the inclusion of the palm heel deflection and circle block preceding the three previously described techniques. A basic tenant of Chinese gung-fu is that each movement is an energy vector which has the potential to materialize as a block or deflection, a strike, a chin na grab or wrestling hold or a throw. This concept connotes an energy flow (Pangainoon – soft outside, hard inside), sticking to the opponent (mushimi or chi sau – sticky hands), and transforming movement in response to that encountered from the opponent (sensing jin.) This is in sharp distinction to modern sport-oriented karate where movements are usually simplified and identified as having discrete and limited application. Unlike training for sport application, the internalization of this sequence in no way promotes disengagement from the opponent once contact is made. As Jim Maloney Sensei instructs senior Uechi practitioners “Once I detach, I only have to go back in. Why would I want to do that?” Why indeed?
Having made the cognitive shift necessary to view the palm-heel/circle “block” sequence as not necessarily denoting blocks, we may imagine them as strikes. Where the sequence initially contained three strikes now we have a set of five attacking movements. Think of defense as a fence that you erect between yourself and your opponents intent to inflict harm upon you. In this light, whenever you have the opportunity, why not hit him with one of your “fence posts”?
Conclusion
As any living system, Uechi style karate is challenged to change and grow or suffer entropy and extinction. The waters of time and change are perilous indeed and many civil combative traditions have perished as a consequence of their refusal or inability to adapt. Growing cultural difficulties with commercialism and a litigious society have contributed to the dilution of “honest” styles. In an era of unbridled narcissism and individual entitlement many well meaning Sensei have “watered down” traditional training values in an effort to retain students. Entire systems have shifted their foci to sporting application. Thus far, Uechi-Ryu karate has held forth a “real” karate with value sustaining for the 21st century.
Perhaps some of Uechi-Ryu’s ability to endure is simply a matter of good joss (fortune) or perhaps a genuine individual, collective, and organizational internalization of the teachings of kata Sanchin. The practice of Uechi-Ryu Sanchin promotes the ability to remain calmly focused in the midst of furious action. It allows the trainee access to total awareness of the realities of the present–awareness unblemished by illusion regarding past or future.
As mentioned previously, Uechi-ka are increasingly sensitized to the importance of attending to the totality of energies available within the art–yin and yang/soft and hard. It is the author’s contention that Uechi-Ryu’s viability is enhanced by this ability to look back in time without self-deception or embellishment and rediscover its roots in authentic Chinese gung-fu.
Senior Okinawan masters have long sought the yin dimensions of their art. Kenko Nakaima Sensei of Ryuei-Ryu Karate has stated “This is the highest stage of a student’s kata development – kata that looks as if it has no strength at all.” Close examination of vintage films of Kanei Uechi Sensei performing the kata of Uechi-Ryu karate reveal this relaxed power. This is Pangainoon/Uechi-Ryu–soft outside and hard inside–the iron fist in the velvet glove.
It is the author’s sincere wish and fervent hope that this article may serve as a springboard for discussion, debate, and further research into the wonders of this traditional karate style.

Sources

Mattson, George Uechi-Ryu Karate Do Peabody, Brockton. 1974
Ibid The Way of Karate Tuttle, Boston. 1963
Bibliography

Cartmell, Tim personal communication 1999
Frantzis, B. K. The Power of Internal Martial Arts North Atlantic, Berkeley. 1998
Higaonna, Morio The History of Karate p. 68. Dragon, U.K. 1995
Higaonna, Morio Traditional Karate Do, Vol. I Fundamental Techniques p. 21. Sugawara, Tokyo. 1985
Edwards, John Editorial, Dragon Times p. 2. Dragon Associates, Thousand Oaks, Vol. 10, 1998
Habersetzer, Roland Karate Fur Meister Mit Korper Und Geist p. 34. Verlag, Berlin. 1994
Maloney, J. “New Wave” Uechi-Ryu Uechi-Ryu Video Magazine # 016. Peabody, Brockton. 1996
McCarthy, Patrick The Bible of Karate: Bubishi p. 64. Tuttle, Rutland. 1995
Speigel, Herbert and Speigel, David Trance and Treatment pp.253-254. American Psychiatric Press, Washington. 1978
McCarthy, Patrick The Bible of Karate: Bubishi p. 38. Tuttle, Rutland. 1995
Co, A.L. Five Ancestor Fist Kung-Fu: The Way of Ngo Cho Kun pp. 44-46. Tuttle, Rutland. 1983
Haygood, Roger Jook Lum Temple Praying Mantis p. 9. Bamboo Temple, Decatur. 1997
Dollar, Alan Secrets of Uechi-Ryu Karate and the Mysteries of Okinawa p. 124. Cherokee, Antioch. 1996
Montaigue, Erle Yang Lu-Ch’an Old Yang Style MTG #2 Video Lecture/Demonstration Moon Ta Gu Productions, Murwillumbah
Frantzis, B. K. The Power of Internal Martial Arts p. 110. North Atlantic, Berkeley. 1998
Liu Xing-Han and Bracy, John Ba Gua p. 111. North Atlantic, Berkeley. 1998
Babin, Michael T’ai Chi Ch’uan: The Martial Side pp. 110. Paladin, Boulder. 1992
Yang, Jwing-Ming The Essence of Shaolin White Crane: Martial Power and Qigong p. 101. YMAA, Jamaica Plain. 1996
Yang, Jwing-Ming The Essence of Shaolin White Crane: Martial Power and Qigong YMAA, Jamaica Plain. 1996
Yang, Jwing-Ming The Essence of Shaolin White Crane: Martial Power and Qigong p. 127. YMAA, Jamaica Plain. 1996
Yang, Jwing-Ming The Essence of Shaolin White Crane: Martial Power and Qigong p. 257. YMAA, Jamaica Plain. 1996
Dollar, Alan Secrets of Uechi-Ryu Karate and the Mysteries of Okinawa p. p. 414. Cherokee, Antioch. 1996
Cartmell, Tim and Miller, Dan Xing Yi Nei Gong pp. 76-85. High View, Pacific Grove. 1994
Liu, Chang I Feeding Crane Gung Fu Video Lecture/Demonstration Tsunami, Thousand Oaks. 1998
Thompson, J. personal communication. Annual Philadelphia Uechi-Ryu Karate Academy Seminar. July 19 and 20, 1997.
McCarthy, Patrick The Bible of Karate: Bubishi p. 66. Tuttle, Rutland. 1995
Mattson, George Uechi-Ryu Video Magazine # 010 Peabody, Brockton. 1995
Pantazi, E. and Diorio, S. Inner Secrets Kyusho Video Series Volumes 2 and 3: Uechi-Ryu Kata Seisan and Sanseiryu Inner Secrets, Middleton. 1998
Yang, Jwing-Ming The Root of Chinese Chi Kung pp. 20-35. YMAA, Jamaica Plain. 1989
Haygood, Roger Personal Communication 1997
Williams, Randy Wing Chun Gung-Fu: The Explosive Art of Close Range Combat, Vol. VI, Combat Theory and Drills: an Instructor’s Manual pp. 206-217. Clean Ace, Singapore. 1989
Maloney, J. “New Wave” Uechi-Ryu Uechi-Ryu Video Magazine #016. Peabody, Brockton. 1996
Bishop, Mark Okinawan Karate: Teachers, Styles, and Secret Techniques p. 21. A and C Black, London. 1989

Copyright 2001 by David Elkins, 1160 Garden Grove, Roseburg, OR 97470
Telephone # 541/672-3565
davide@mcsi.net

CLEARING THE WAY THROUGH SPIRITUAL MARTIAL ARTS
by Sensei Sequoia

 WELCOME TO HANTA YO …. The Martial Arts, although fighting arts, are at the deepest level about the fight over ones self. We find our own internal contradictions to be our true enemy. Gaining control over energies is the purpose of discipline and focus. We may then utilize this focused energy toward healing, well-being and creative expression.

Usually people are fixated in their attention. This is a condition when excessive interior dialogue, unconscious bodily function and perpetual emotional consideration keep us stuck in limited areas of our body/mind. The work of Martial Arts is designed to spread consciousness to the extremities of our body so that the hands and feet have as much awareness in them as our thoughts and feelings. The over all effect of conscious work through Martial Arts is to produce a human being who is vitally centered and able to be a positive agent in all aspects of life, including conflict.

Hanta Yo is a Lakota Sioux term that means, “clear the way”. It indicates the intention of drawing on the Great Spirit to clear the way while you do your part with faith. All mystical, conscious work, including yoga and the Martial Arts, are about “plugging in” to an infinite source of creative potential. Techniques vary but the goals are identical: to conduct the life force more dynamically through the body/mind of the human being. Hanta Yo uses breath, conscious movement, balance, discipline and strong intention to accomplish this goal. The process involves The 9 ways of Hanta Yo: the rock way, the lightning way, the fire way, the water way, the wind way, the tree way, the earth way, the heavenly way and the love way. Each way involves a different approach to exercise. While we work out physically, the psychological component is also operative. This is understood as the transmutation of ego through three apparent phases: (solid) rigid, (mellow), and (gas) empty.

The 9 Ways integrate the physical, emotional, mental and spiritual realms of being. Hanta Yo assigns an appropriate action to each of these 4 realms using the following formula of the 4 R’s, Relax the body, Release the emotions, Rest the mind and Recognize the spirit. Tension in any of the four realms impedes the flow of ki. In order to have “flowing ki” the body must be in a relaxed state, allowing both negative and positive “charges” in the emotions to be released. As this occurs the mind is given a rest from it’s chatter. Simply recognizing or remembering the Spirit stimulates “ki” flow”. So we find that tension can be released even eliminated with the “flame of attention”.

The fundamental goal of the Martial artist is “centeredness”. Ideally the very presence of such a person maintains harmony in the immediate environment. However, when the ideal is not the reality and conflict arises, the martial artist is trained to handle most situations. The self-defense techniques that are a basic part of the work enable the martial artist to be a positive force in containing a potential or actual violent situation.

  Training involves strengthening the entire system through exercise, stretching, coordination, balance, stamina and conscious movement. Classes provide a “theater” of interaction where students can smooth out rough areas of their movement and psyches. The phases of ego transformation from solid through liquid to empty are encountered, as students repeatedly must confront their limitations. The opportunity to “flow or grow” appears again and again both within the classes and in the larger scope of social relations.

Okinawan Karate Flow Drills [That I will be teaching at Summer Camp]

Uechi-Ryu Applications of Tegumi Renzokugeiko adapted from Sensei Patrick McCarthy’s video “The McCarthy Seminars I”  Thanks to Master McCarthy for sharing his knowledge and insights.  Osu!

These flow drills represent one of the “lost” elements of traditional karate practice – that of two person continuous energy exchange drills.  In addition to promoting the development of fear control for typical scenarios of unwanted aggression, they contain aspects of iron body conditioning, foster feeling sensitivity, and encourage consolidation of Sanchin root and center.  The twelve drills can be performed consecutively in a giant chain incorporating increasingly sophisticated variations as the practitioner becomes comfortable with the basic patterns. 

When appropriate, anatomical and/or meridian point targets for strikes are noted.  Obviously, in a real fight we are happy just to connect with our opponent – who is attempting not only to thwart our blows, but also to hit us. As impossible as it may seem to target a small moving “point” which, of course should be struck in a specific direction at an ideal time of day, blah, blah – it is good training.  As our shooter friends say “aim small/miss small”.

1.   Kakie

engage forearms (with force) facing partner in Sanchin.  Press up/in snaking hand at wrist at apogee of movement to then pull vigorously toward self using kakie (wrist) hook.  One partner will be palm up the other palm down.  This will change with every successive movement.  Perform designated number and then clash opposite forearms to switch arms much the same as arm rubbing.

 Bunkai

 He R same side grab > R cover/trap (be prepared to raise R elbow to “nosecone” destruction of incoming L cross), hit radial nerve (C10) with L hand, R shuto (as you perform the shuto – the L hand slides down his forearm using shoken flesh grab to seize/pull his R arm to your L hip) convert shuto to reverse neck hook, R knee spike to face, push up on his R arm or shoulder and down on the L side of his head or his L shoulder to spin him around (this is the Silat puta-kapala or double arm crane motion from Sanseiryu kata – a VERY serious application involves stepping on his foot as you perform the spin/ his foot is pinned to the ground and his spine is torqued – the weak link in the chain will break!) spin to deck retaining your hold on his R arm, R iron palm slap to face, double thumb gouges to eyes, head smash on deck using ears as handles, jack chin back and finger spike supraclavicular notch (CV22) – the crane koken strikes from Seisan kata with the exception of the forward movement being palm down

 2.   Straight Punch

to transition from kakie to straight punch one partner simply steps forward and punches

He R lunge straight punch > L retreats and accepts the punch as body conditioning, R Uechi cross block/L iron palm heel strike down on radial nerve C10, L then slides down his forearm in “shrinking ring” (using ripping tiger claw to irradiate his brain with pain/trap/and excruciate tendons and nerves on wrist as it straightens out his arm bringing him into the void and opening his ribcage, R hand slams into lower rib cage.  That hand continues in a counterclockwise arc hitting the richly innervated area of the neck/lower mandible.  From there it hits the forearm again (thus far it has inscribed a reverse circle block), and terminates in a ulna bone forearm smash to the neck.

As a partner drill the “defender” should protect the neck with guarding hand.  The forearm and rib cage border should be conditioned.

To move this drill up and down the deck from the last technique – defender protects neck with guarding hand, sweeps it down and out in a downblock movement (reverse of the initiation of the mawashi uke movement) slap blocks it to the other side of the centerline and punches with the hand used in protecting the neck.

Bunkai – dynamic exit from the drill

After striking the neck – reverse wrap neck in a guillotine movement, lift then sit/roll backwards using the leg nearest your partner to lift his body (in the street you would employ this as a striking lever), as you achieve the “mount” position you are still grasping his R hand.  Using your R hand, iron palm slap his temple with a “tetsui” movement, slip your L foot under his head and fall back perpendicular to him placing him in an armbar and perform an adductive kick to his sternum, xyphoid, bladder, groin, etc. as you break arm.

Variation

After forearm strike to the neck bring his R wrist to your L hip locking his elbow.  Roll your striking arm pivoting at the elbow so that your forearm is perpendicular to the deck (this is the lead arm scoop/throwing motion of the dragon in Sanseiryu) the elbow is ideally digging into his triceps tendon.  Using spit and sink of “swallow, spit, float, and sink” exhale and drop your center.  From there, rotate your forearm clockwise to access his groin (in partner drill we grab hamstring) using shoken flesh grab, rip/twist as you sit down and roll back.  You are now both on your backs with heads facing in opposite directions.  You are still holding his wrist.  Slap down on his face, elbow to the serratus.  Raising his R arm that you are holding,  insert your striking hand behind his elbow and pull his forearm toward your groin to dislocate.  You can alternatively wrench his wrist toward his own forearm.

Editorial – Wrist grabbing is often seen by the naïve as an entry which is seldom the case.  A more likely scenario would involve an individual grabbing another’s wrist to attempt a disengagement from a painful situation such as a groin grab.  Thus the universality of the Tegumi flows – like kata the movements are finite but the applications infinite. Similarly, everything has an entry, an execution, and a follow through.  As in knife fighting, command of the nuances of transition is what distinguishes novice from journeyman from master.

3.   Forearm clashing

 to transition from straight punch to forearm clashing, one partner simply steps forward and delivers a low forearm strike rather than a punch

 Face partner in Sanchin.  Hand not in use should be in guard.

 a.     R low arm clash (from cross block motion)

b.    L high arm clash (from shuto movement)

2 kakie movements as in exercise #1

c.     R hand performs circle block to high clash

both partners form guarding hand structure and press out/up/down/and in forming an invisible elliptical plane between them similar to the triple hirakins of Seisan.

d.    after two energy exchanges of part c., partner A performs a straight punch at B’s head.  B defends with hajiki uke.  Both return to origin and the roles reverse with B trying to hit A.  A defends with hijiki uke.  All of these motions are done with the same arm that initially clashed in “c”.  It is single sticky hand (dan chi-sau).

e.     Once again for the third time, press dynamically out/up/down/in

f.      Conclude this flow with a low sweep block (gedan barai) movement using the same hand.

 Bunkai

 Now it’s your turn, enjoy being creative.  Anything goes as long as it conforms to the fighting concepts and principles of Uechi-Ryu.

 4.   Shoving

 to transition from forearm clashing to shoving, one partner simply steps forward and delivers a middle gate shove rather than a low forearm smash

 He shoves > circle block allowing the circle block to dissipate/guide his energy into a “push hands” exchange – think of it as Uechi arm rubbing turned on its side.  Exchange roles by aggressively trapping his arms, stepping forward and shoving with other hand.  He responds by stepping back and repeating drill.  This exercise emphasizes the origin of movement being from the dan tien not the shoulder/arms.  In the initial stages of learning this drill, go softly.  One of the primary objectives of this drill is to learn the skills of “cotton body” – the ability to displace your mass at will denying your opponent centerline advantage.  You will retard your progress in this skill if you approach it as an iron rod rather than a wad of cotton.

 5.  Defending/attacking

 to transition from shoving to defending/attacking, one partner simply delivers a shove as in the previous drill

 he R shoves > R “catch-up” block (a slapping palm moving backward on the elbow line as opposed to the usual manifestation of it moving forward slightly preceding the circle block – think of it as a continuation of the retraction phase of the Sanchin thrust.  L slams on his radius/R shuto to throat.  He stops with his L guarding hand, pushes my strike down and away as he circles his R hand toward and then away from himself to launch shuto at me.  I protect similarly.  We then flow with reciprocal exchange of shutos/deflections. 

 To switch sides – when he shoves my hand down, he continues to drop his elbow down into my chest, continues forward energy into a shoulder bump to my chest, and finally attacks with his own shuto with the opposite hand (actually the same side that is folding) > defend and drill continues.

 This drill teaches a late defense (the catch-up movement), the ability to “fold” joints when your attack is blocked, allowing you to hit with the next weapon in the line of your skeletal structure, and the ability to defend and immediately launch a counteroffensive when you are caught off guard and surprised by an attack.  As in the previous drill, go easy at first to develop great speed in this drill.  It should look like hitting a speed bag!

 6.   Hook Punch #1

 to transition from defending/attacking to hook punch, one partner simply delivers a hook rather than a shove

 He R hooks (sucker punch) > L shuto, snake R hand underneath to circle block (this is an interesting movement as it could easily be either an eye poke, fish hook, throat grab, or a ripping tiger claw movement inside or outside his arm as a function of the directional flow of combative energy at the moment), L hand checks his arm at elbow, launch my own R hook (in the street both of my “defensive” movements seek to destroy in the manner of a FMA “Gunting” targets being the radial nerve and the ulnar nerve – funny bone, or the vulnerable elbow joint) .

To switch – duck the hook and return fire from the opposite side – slick! 

 7.   Straight Punch

 to transition from hook punch to straight punch, one partner simply delivers a lunge punch rather than a hook.  Alternately, my partner can check my hook with his shuto and immediately return fire with a lunge straight punch.

 He throws R straight P > L slap block/R circle block, L check, and return fire with a R lunge P.  To switch, when I check he steps in aggressively and punches me.

 This drill is reminiscent of Uechi kokekitae only it uses a checking hand in the penultimate movement rather than trusting the circle block to keep his striking arm under control.  This drill (as any of the others also) can be “spiced-up” by adding variety in the angle of attack.  It teaches aggressive response particularly on the switch – if you check and hesitate, he will continue his attack.  Your “defense” must be continuous and relentless.

 8.   Hacking Elbow

 This technique is the mirror image of the second movement of “hijizuki”

 to transition from hook punch to hacking elbow, one partner simply delivers an elbow rather than a hook

 He R hacking elbow > L hand soft “catcher’s mitt” absorbs his energy, R circle block (or hajiki uke for a destruction approach), turn his arm internally, L check his arm, and return hacking elbow.

 To switch, I catch and he aggressively steps forward to throw elbow from other side.

 9.   Lock-Flow

 Sorry, you should have figured out transitions by now

He R overhead strike > L hajiki uke, R circle blk, immediately grab/pull to extend his arm, enter with L foot/pivot clockwise to deliver a rising forearm to his tri tendon (elbow strike structure of middle Seisan kata)

 He will likely pull back resisting the hyperextension of his arm

 Then snake your L arm over his arm in the crook, your R hand bends his hand in a “gooseneck” fingers toward his face (your L hand can brace on your own R upper arm for leverage in a figure 4 configuration – you may as well as you’ll be using it in a minute)

 He will likely try to back away from you resisting the wrist lock

 Then shoot your R foot out so that you are now facing him and apply forward downward pressure on the shoulder joint with the figure 4 on his R arm

 He will likely try to resist in a forward direction to alleviate the pain in his shoulder

 Then shoot your R foot back so that you are once again at his R side, R grab/pull his wrist, L drive your forearm into the bottom of his mandible/neck area of s9 and s5.  this is a set-up for the next movement which is

 Turn his wrist over so that palm faces ceiling, snake your R arm down/over/around his arm so that your radius bone presses on his tri tendon, grab your own gi or shirt and lift your elbow up in front to jack his elbow joint

 Shove him away – like the phoenix that rises from its ashes, he foolishly comes back for more with an overhead on the other side.

 10.                       Uppercut

 He R uppercut > fade back that side (use “cotton body” to move your gut out of harm’s way – imagine that he has a knife).  For that matter, don’t imagine, train it with one partner stabbing with a drone.  As you step back, L downward/forward strike to his brachialis.  Wing Chun players call this motion a “gum sau” (‘pressing hand’).  It is the energy of the double strike from Sanchin with hand structure in fingers facing internally/palms down and parallel to the ground.  You are not trying to merely stop him, but to hurt him at the same time.  R nukite or Sanchin thrust to the suprasternal notch (cv22), R shuto to his R tricep tendon (c12), circle your L hand up so that you twist his arm into a half-nelson.  As he spins around he throws a L rear elbow to your head which you protect with your R palm “catcher’s mitt”.  Push with your R/pull with your L so that his body spins back toward you.  He will uppercut with his L hand and you repeat drill. 

 11.                     Hook #2

 He R hook > L shuto (which quickly converts to a grab/pull, R vertical palm or Bushiken to temple (Yang reservoir, gb3), R neck grab pulls his head in to a R shoulder butt, pop his head back by explosively straightening your R arm hitting his face with your bicep, just as explosively – pull his head back in to a L elbow strike. 

 This is a good place to experiment with broken timing strikes.  Actually, it’s not a good place to experiment as it is far too dangerous to learn on the head/neck.  The concepts can be used with the wa-uke strike from Sanchin with much less potential risk.  After popping his head back with your arm extension, use the neck grab that pulls his head back to the elbow strike as an adductive strike – don’t just pull him, hit him.  The broken timing comes in via delaying the elbow a ½ beat after the neck/jaw strike.  This sets up rotation. Remember that neck breaks are done with rotation + extension of the cervical vertebrae.  A neck break can occur if the two strikes are done with broken timing and some angulation to hyperextend the neck. This potentially lethal strike would best be done with a L palm rather than an elbow in view of the additional control offered by the hand.

 As if the preceding was not sufficient to dissuade the bad guy from further unwarranted aggression, add the following:  after the elbow sandwich (looks like the mirror image of elbow strike into the hand in the dragon sequence at the end of kata Seisan), jam your R radius bone against his L mastoid process (neck below/behind the ear) as you drive/grind your L ulna bone into the orbital nerve of his R cheek.  This exposes his R temple which you immediately head butt.  Push him away – he returns with a hook from the other side, and the drill begins anew.

 12.                     Hook #3

 He R hook > check with shuto that quickly converts to a grab/pull, R radius forearm smash to his sternal mastoid area of the neck,  R ulna strike to his upper forearm (c10), retaining your L grab of his R arm, R step cross body so that you are in front of him as you rotate his arm (hand thumb up) internally to your L shoulder.  Lever his elbow joint (called “old man carries a pole”), bring him to his toes then L downward palm strike to his groin, step back outside him with your L leg as both hands perform an Irish whip (clockwise rotation) to his R arm, R downward palm strike to his occipital area, shove him away – he returns with opposite side hook.

 Where to go from here?  Well, if we were training together we would be adding footwork supporting various attitudes, we would interrupt timing, consider various entry and exit scenarios, add kicks, and later stop-kicks.  We might even take some or part of the entire sequence to the ground and see how we could use our skills in that venue.  We would definitely train outdoors on hard and soft regular and uneven or slippery surfaces.  Later, we might even put something in our hands to do the drills – maybe to begin with, something hard like a stick or a claw hammer, then maybe something sharp like a knife or a BBQ skewer (just kidding?), and when we really thought we were hot stuff, we might try the whole routine blindfolded!  Just some food for thought.  Enjoy. 

The Roots of Okinawan Iron Body Conditioning in Sanchin Kata 

By: David Elkins, Michael DeDonato John Morenski

“This article provides a compendium of Okinawan Iron Body Conditioning drills and a comprehensive analysis of Sanchin Shime.” November, 2001

Articles by Darren Laur:

Edged weapon tactics and counter tactics: January, 2002

Street 101: by Darren Laur: January, 2002

Articles by David Gimberline

• Thoughts on teaching
• Blind Spots in Traditional Training
• Side Thrust Kick
• Speed
• Hangetsu
• Makiwara
• FUZHOU SUPARINPEI

Articles by Ethan Miller:

• Hand Strike Training
• Five Weapons of Uechi-Ryu’s Hiraken Strike
• Enhanced Training With Kyu Kumite and Dan Kumite
• Ideas for Nikite Training